MamaGravity good back-story, and good acting

Dynamixor The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.

StyleSk8r At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

Caryl It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties. It's a feast for the eyes. But what really makes this dramedy work is the acting.

tenshi_ippikiookami "How to Start a Revolution" explains a little bit about Gene Sharp's work about bringing non-violent movements to the light, an approach little known about but that has shown that it works more than violent revolutions. Sharp has written some books, and has made a list of 198 ideas of how societies can try to change their countries. You may not agree with his list or his ideas, but that doesn't mean that they should be thrown away. For any human being out there, non-violent solution to a problem has probably worked more than once, be it an excuse to not wash the dishes or the "forgotten" homework.Sadly, the movie is as manipulative as it comes. First, it takes the white guy saves the world perspective, making Sharp's work more important than it is. He is good in bringing some ideas to the public light. That doesn't mean he created them or that he is the one implementing them. It takes people out of the light. Oh, yes, you have some interviews... about how important Sharp's books were. Really? People didn't know that singing had an use till Sharp said so? It reeks of pandering. And people that do a good job shouldn't need that. On top of that the best world would be a world without heroes. You just need them in time of need, so... And how about all this countries that are spoken about (Ukraine, Egipt, Syria...). Did the ideas work out? Were they correctly implemented, or implemented by the "right" people? I can hide information and make things seem what they are not too.And if that was not enough, the film tries to play with the viewer's feelings, using music and images in a cheap cheap way.If we take into account that non-violent movements is something that should be thought more about, the movie should not pander to the converted. And if you want to make a movie about Gene Sharp, make it about him, not about his supernatural powers to bring revolution.

balpomoreli Or why is important to keep fighting without violence to get a healthy people's revolution.This is a great and not well known documentary of the works and opinions of a man who shows once again that ideas have repercussions. Gene Sharp has influenced pacific revolutions all around the globe and will keep guiding them with their revolutionary manuals to go from dictatorship to democracies. Or from tyrannies to people's governments. The documentary goes quite well trough the passed revolutions influenced by Gene and some of the leaders of it. It shows basically that people have power, even in the worst regimes, and this is priceless.I warn you, watching and getting to know this could be extremely helpful for the people in your country.