Solemplex To me, this movie is perfection.

GrimPrecise I'll tell you why so serious

Curapedi I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.

Kirandeep Yoder The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

gurdeepmann59 This film is OK Like all the other reviews even I think that this film should have been made in the 70s or 80sThe film has Anil Kapoor's noble family taking charge of the village and making almost every decision It does look kind of weird as it's like their family is butting into the decision of every other family in the village There is also a side story which eventually goes into the main story and that is Shakti Kapoor who plays the villain of the filmDirection is outdated Music isn't very interestingAnil Kapoor doesn't suit the old role but is passable in the young role Rekha is brilliant Raveena Tandon is interesting in the first half Harish is bad Paresh Rawal is funny Sadashiv Ampurkar is good Shakti Kapoor is purely evil as the villain

silvan-desouza The film released at the start of 2000 alongwith MELA both disasters So sad to start a millennium with such nonsenseThe film seems to suit 70's but looks like an unintentional comedy for 2000Anywayz some classic gems from the film: Paresh Rawal I don't understand to laugh at his role or cry Reason: He goes searching his mother in the village worst part is when he realises a secret of Anil he keeps the secret in his stomach which becomes big and makes him look pregnant I remember in my childhood my teacher told me the same joke Urrf!!!! as a child i laughed at it that time but here?The whole film is a joke can't explain We have Anil in a dual role(One older and younger) and Rekha playing the older's wife and Raveena the youngers We also have reject Harish while Shakti playing the son of Aruna Irani who both fight on who has the worst wigDirection is outdated Music is badAnil tries hard looks too old in the younger role and too young in the older role yet good effort Rekha is adequate, Raveena too is okay Harish is bad Shakti Kapoor is terrible Aruna Irani is as usual Rajnikant is okay in a cameo

Mrs_Chowdhury Relentlessly violent potboiler with no redeeming features. Not even the violence is original, save for the seeming relish in battering the female members of the piece in a variety of ways.Oh yes. You'll see most types of abuse here. Raveena Tandon a Meena tries to be sympathetic as the wronged heroine wife of the outcast(e) brother but just ends up looking like any other once-glamorous actress marking time before she ends up playing grey-haired sainted mothers. Rekha just looks depressed. When they aren't being beaten up by the predictably demonic villain. There is a final scene where the pregnant Tandon is battered in an open arena whilst trying to protect husband Arjun, and immediately goes into labour/miscarriage, culminating in local village women surrounding the stricken Meena, and Rekha reuniting the female family members. This culminates in a perversely orgiastic scene where her face is splashed, porno money shot style, with Meenas' breaking waters. That was the only new thing I could see in this trashcan of a film.

Sukhbir Johal I watched this movie thinking it was an old one from 1994 but then was shocked to discover it released in 2000. Everything about this movies says early nineties, Anil Kapoor in a double role neither of which suit him one to old and one to young. Rekha looks great and still performs with vigour but she looked like she was competing with Raveena Tandon on screen. Raveena Tandon looked great also and being such a brilliant and professional actress she rose above Rekha's childishness and produced a good performances first spoilt brat and then pregnant wife. The movie overall was not good flop through and through 3 out of 10 the 3 for Raveena Tandon.