Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated

Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Hayden Kane There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Fatma Suarez The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

Michael Ledo The English title for this film is "Blood Redd" which doesn't let you know it is a werewolf film, but written by punsters who were as talented as the "Joan of Arcadia" crowd. My apologies to the individual who watched the TV series.The film opens with a werewolf scene and we discover that young girls are being found with their crotch chewed out. The police investigator (Michael The) believes the girls are being raped and large dogs are being used to hide the evidence while the pathologist (Christopher Frainza) believes the community may be annoyed by a werewolf issue.The film really centers on Lauren Redd (Stephanie Hullar) hence the oh-so-clever English title. She visits her grandmother (Peggy Ivene) and in one scene is wearing what looks like a red cloak. Albert (Torey Widener) is grandmother's care taker who is clearly not what he seems.I really did like the plot idea, including the way they handled the twist (sorry I mentioned it.) However, the low budget aspect killed the film. The sound wasn't good. The special effects, which we see at the end, were abysmally bad. The sound track which started out fine during the opening credits feel into a tired piano. The acting was below "B" film standard with the dialogue not helping.Guide: The film was made in English. I caught 1 F-bomb. No sex or nudity. Stephanie Hullar gives us a little tease.

Leofwine_draca BLOOD REDD is an indie horror film absolutely nothing like the video cover or indeed synopsis. This looks like a werewolf horror movie, but instead it's just a bunch of characters who spend the entire running time wandering around a single house. The interacting actors seem bored throughout, and it's hard to blame them; there's no meat or interest in the story here. One gruesome death scene is all that's on offer.

kosmasp Remember: This is a low budget movie and you should give the movie some slack. Especially at the beginning, it might take you some time to accept what this is. Or the characters in it. One in particular is so cliché it might hurt you watching this. Not as much hurting though as is going to happen to people involved in this.It might not be the best special effects, it might not have the best camera and some of the acting is way off. The script and direction has its flaws too of course. But I and some of the reviewers here are giving it the benefit of the doubt. It tries to tell a story and it does a decent job. Only if you give way as mentioned before. Not a masterpiece by a mile

GT 7127 This is not a big Hollywood production with all of the shiny bells and whistles. It's a no budget, horror flick complete with crappy picture quality. It does, however, have a rather original and interesting story line, which is not common in Hollywood big budgets these days. If you are into the old B horror films like "The Blob" you may get a kick out of this, but if you are looking for a Star Wars type you will be sorely disappointed. I actually thought the acting was quite good for a B horror flick, especially the lead actress, Stephanie Hullar, who plays Lauren Redd. A no/low budget film makes it hard for an actor to look good, but she pulls it off. It has some nice special effects for a low budget. It also has an interesting twist on the idea of werewolves. I think it's a great film for those who are into the old horror films. It's the kind I would expect to see on the old Friday Fright Night shows.